On Thu, 11 Jun 2026 15:36:24 GMT, Viktor Klang <[email protected]> wrote:

>> David Simms has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a 
>> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 2799 commits:
>> 
>>  - Merge remote-tracking branch 'valhalla/lworld' into 8317277
>>  - 8386239: [lworld] Update jdk/java/util/Arrays/ArraysEqCmpTest.java
>>    
>>    Reviewed-by: liach
>>  - 8386242: [lworld] Simplify and clarify StrictProcessor
>>    
>>    Reviewed-by: dsimms
>>  - 8386140: [lworld] FieldReflector using wrong Class argument
>>    
>>    Reviewed-by: alanb, dsimms
>>  - 8386216: [lworld] Rollback meaningless diff in EventClassBuilder
>>    
>>    Reviewed-by: dsimms
>>  - Merge remote-tracking branch 'valhalla/lworld' into 8317277
>>  - 8385170: [lworld] Serialization spec needs to allow abstract value 
>> classes like Number
>>    
>>    Reviewed-by: liach
>>  - 8385980: [lworld] Standardize pattern for preview value class generation
>>    
>>    Reviewed-by: liach
>>  - 8386086: [lworld] 
>> sun/jvmstat/monitor/MonitoredVm/MonitorVmStartTerminate.java should be 
>> removed from problem list
>>    
>>    Reviewed-by: liach, dcubed
>>  - Merge
>>    
>>    Merge jdk-28+1
>>  - ... and 2789 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/92298786...26c8f2e4
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/Object.java line 523:
> 
>> 521:      *      <div class="preview-comment">
>> 522:      *          If this object is a {@linkplain 
>> java.util.Objects#hasIdentity value object},
>> 523:      *          it does does not have a monitor, an {@code 
>> IllegalMonitorStateException} is thrown.
> 
> Suggestion:
> 
>      *          it does not have a monitor, an {@code 
> IllegalMonitorStateException} is thrown.

As per PR body description:

> [!NOTE]
> The "*sub-review pull requests*" contain the same full set of code changes as 
> this "*master pull request*" to preserve the full implementation context; the 
> language compiler, JVM, and standard library changes are intertwined. The 
> separate pull requests exist only to subdivide the review and related 
> discussion by area.

Please continue your comments here: https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/31123

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31120#discussion_r3429038836

Reply via email to