On Tue, 30 Jun 2026 15:53:32 GMT, Jaikiran Pai <[email protected]> wrote:

>> David Simms has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a 
>> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 2859 commits:
>> 
>>  - Merge branch '8317277' into jep401_sub_review_8317279
>>  - Merge remote-tracking branch 'valhalla/lworld' into 8317277
>>  - Merge
>>    
>>    Merge jdk-28+4
>>  - 8386963: [lworld] Improve the exception message from Object 
>> synchronization methods on value objects
>>    
>>    Reviewed-by: dholmes, alanb
>>  - 8387300: [lworld] Minor review comments in javac
>>    
>>    Reviewed-by: vromero
>>  - 8387192: [lworld] Review comment drop for core libs
>>    
>>    Reviewed-by: jvernee, vromero
>>  - 8386999: [lworld] C2: assert(is_dead_loop_safe()) failed: shouldn't be 
>> cleared yet
>>    
>>    Reviewed-by: qamai, vlivanov
>>  - 8386787: [lworld] 
>> compiler/valhalla/inlinetypes/TestValueConstruction.java#StressIncrementalInliningDontInlineMyAbstractInit
>>  timed out
>>    
>>    Reviewed-by: phubner, chagedorn
>>  - 8386995: [lworld] Duplicate value classes are a preview feature warning
>>    
>>    Reviewed-by: alanb, vromero
>>  - 8383389: [lworld] Augment AOTMapLogger::print_oop_details to support flat 
>> arrays with oops
>>    
>>    Reviewed-by: iklam, fparain
>>  - ... and 2849 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/193de1b1...cdbe55a9
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/util/ReferencedKeyMap.java line 52:
> 
>> 50:  * accomplished by using a backing map where the keys are either a
>> 51:  * {@link WeakReference} or a {@link SoftReference}.
>> 52:  * Keys must be {@linkplain Class#isIdentity() identity objects.}
> 
> There is a typo here. `Class` doesn't have an `isIdentity()` method in this 
> version of the JEP implementation. I'll file an issue to fix it and to link 
> it to `Class.isValue()`.

Hmm. There are build warning for javadoc link issues like that. If those 
warnings were disabled, they should be re-enabled before integration.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31123#discussion_r3500162216

Reply via email to