On Mon, 10 Aug 2026 09:01:13 GMT, Julian Waters <[email protected]> wrote:
> I sure hope I didn't end up breaking the JDK for the 1000th time, but I'll > see if I can do anything if I did break anything. Sorry for the trouble! No worries, and nothing to apologize for :-) @raneashay uses InterceptOSException to verify their patch, and at the moment we are discussing what the merits of this patch are. For that, it was necessary to understand the intent of InterceptOSException, and that turned out to be trickier than I thought. Hence my question to you, since I thought you were the author. But you are right, and in fact this switch even predates the initial OpenJDK commit in 2007. Probably nobody is around anymore who knows what its original intent was. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31614#issuecomment-5238708189
