On Fri, 21 Aug 2026 21:09:20 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yeah, but thinking that uncommon traps are maybe about cold branches, the > branch data that lost 0->1 update due to subsampling looks to be a plausible > way to get extra uncommon trap? Something along those lines... That could be. I'm going to create a test mode that runs both standard and randomized counter in parallel. That should end the need for speculation about what the cause my be. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28541#issuecomment-5379637278
