On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:54 PM, Assaf Arkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 2:50 PM, lacton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I'm glad to report I'm getting 100% code coverage for both >> cobertura.rb and emma.rb with the pending new tests! >> >> Yet, I'm feeling these figures are somewhat optimistic. We don't know >> the path coverage, which would probably be lower. > > It measures line coverage, but not every possible execution path: > > http://www.pervasivecode.com/blog/2007/07/11/rcov-c0-line-coverage-more-generous-than-emmas-c1-bytecode-coverage/
Very clear and informative article. Thank you. Lacton > Assaf
