My answer to these types of questions is always to let the user decide or in this case let them develop the addons. When I first proposed this I was actually just thinking about a SQL-only solution.
-Shane On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Assaf Arkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 6:56 AM, Shane Witbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > DB migrations as part of the build/deploy process via Buildr: > > > > http://code.google.com/p/c5-db-migration/ > > > > What do you think? > > Yes. > > It sounds to me like all migration solutions are nearly the same when > you're changing schemas around. But then you need to populate a > table, generate fake data, or shift data around, and now it's a > question of how to run non-SQL code and which language and ORM you > favor. > > Do we want to pick, or just have people develop different addons? > > Assaf > > > > > > > -Shane > > >
