I added a JIRA issue for adding recipes:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-28

Assaf

On 1/22/08, Assaf Arkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 1/22/08, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Problem with wiki contents coming from non-committers is that they don't
> > have a paper trail that enables Apache projects to package the
> > documentation.
> > So yes, it is nice to have user contributed documentation, and no, you
> > can't
> > include it in the distribution.
> >
> > Also note that you need to be careful with wiki contents that are part
> > of
> > the 'official' site. A PMC needs to make clear what is official and what
> > is
> > user generated content. The former is 'approved' and official for the
> > ASF,
> > the latter is, though under the supervision of the Buildr (P)PMC, not
> > 'official ASF' documentation.
>
>
> That's correct.  If we had an open Wiki that anyone can add to, for legal
> reasons, we would not be able to pull that into the official Buildr
> documentation.   I totally missed out on that before, that documentation is
> still subject to copyright issues, not just the source code.  So if you want
> to contribute a recipe, and we want it to show up in the official
> documentation, it would have to go through JIRA.
>
> It's possible to maintain two Wikis, which some projects do, one official
> -- only committers can write to -- and one unofficial.  Some projects use
> that, and you'd put recipes and troubleshooting tips in the unofficial
> Wiki.  I prefer to include that in the official documentation as soon as it
> shows up.
>
> So the best work around we found so far is to use Textile, which is as
> easy to work with as any other Wiki markup.  And creating/merging changes
> against Textile files is actually easier than using a Wiki.  Once the change
> is committed, single rake task uploads it to the Web site.  (It will only
> show up the next day, when Apache synchronizes, but that's also true for
> Wiki edits).
>
> Assaf
>
>
> My $0.02
> >
> > Martijn
> >
> > On 1/22/08, Thomas Marek < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > dhpeterson wrote:
> > > > I vote +1 for a mini rake intro in the buildr guide. :)
> > > >
> > > > It would be very useful to better understand tasks, file tasks, rake
> >
> > > deps
> > > > etc, and their relationship to buildr. I have reviewed the docs on
> > the
> > > rake
> > > > site already but I didn't find them to be overly useful.
> > > >
> > > > I would also like to see some buildr "samples" - e.g. single app
> > > projects,
> > > > multi-app projects, building WARs and JARs, and building a custom
> > ZIP
> > > (for a
> > > > headless app) which is something I have just managed to do. I would
> > be
> > > happy
> > > > to contribute whatever I can.
> > > >
> > > > Regs,
> > > >
> > > > Dave
> > > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Wouldn't it be great to have a wiki for creating such thing like
> > intros
> > > and receipts?
> > > Does apache not provide wikis for their projects?
> > > And assaf could merge the content with the svn docs?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Thomas
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
> > Apache Wicket 1.3.0 is released
> > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0
> >
>
>
>
> --
> CTO, Intalio
> http://www.intalio.com
>



-- 
CTO, Intalio
http://www.intalio.com

Reply via email to