> On 1 May 2017, at 2:57 pm, Christopher <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Strongly prefer single-letter views over the letter-range view names. See 
> JIRA for detailed explanation. Thanks.

Sure, but I did go through all the single letter views and they were hardly in 
use, the combination letter ranges 
are much much in use.

Gav...
> 
> On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 4:20 AM Gavin McDonald <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> We are starting to get complaints about the amount of top level views in our 
> Jenkins instance.
> 
> I believe it is time for cleanup of those views once more.
> 
> A few years ago, I cleaned up a heap of views and got quite some complaints 
> from projects 
> about doing so, without consultation, and the fact that this breaks links 
> some projects use.
> 
> Since that time however, projects have continued to create new Top Level 
> views and now 
> we are at a stage where again there are too many - there are currently 22 
> project type views.
> 
> There are many more projects and I’d hate for this trend to continue upwards 
> and clutter the 
> main Jenkins landing page even more.
> 
> I have created an INFRA ticket to track this at :
> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14002 
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14002> 
> 
> The views I propose to remove are :
> 
> Airavata, Apache Commons, Apex, Beam Brooklyn, Calciate, CarbonData, DL, 
> Groovy, Hawq, Infra Jobs Monitor View, Lucene, OWB, Olingo, OpenJPA, POI, 
> Shiro, Tamaya, Tika, XMLGraphics. cloudstack, directory
> 
> Also: All the single letter viewss from A to Z. They are not much used and it 
> is preferred to use 'A-D', 'E-G', 'H-L', 'M-R' and 'S-Z'
> 
> Two Views unsure what to do with are: 'Incubator Projects' and 'PreCommit 
> Builds'
> 
> 
> Some views have already been removed, I removed one called ‘jobs I have 
> access to’ or something like that, the Maven project also removed their top 
> level views so my thanks to them. 
> The Infra jobs monitor view is one I created, my fault and Im going to move 
> it under H-L where it belongs.
> 
> ACTION NEEDED:- Please, could all project who are listed above as having a 
> top level view, please move it to a view under the appropriate letters group, 
> or remove it.
> 
> The two Im not sure about ‘Incubator Projects’ and ‘PreCommit Builds’ , 
> ‘Incubator Projects’ may be a benefit at top level if used correctly.
> ‘PreCommit Builds’ is not one owned by any one project, Im unsure whether 
> this could stay top level and be a benefit.
> 
> I’ll be moving the Infra views shortly.
> 
> If, after a week, there are still projects at the top level view, I’ll move 
> onto the next step of mailing the projects dev lists directly, though that 
> should not be required if they have the representation on this list.
> 
> Thanks in advance.
> 
> I’ll keep the INFRA-14002 ticket updated with progress.
> 
> Gav… (ASF Infra.)

Reply via email to