> On Oct 30, 2017, at 4:33 AM, Dominik Psenner <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> On 2017-10-30 11:57, Thomas Bouron wrote:
>> Thanks for the reply and links. Went already to [1] but it wasn't clear to
>> me what distro each node was (unless going through every one of them but...
>> there are a lot) As you said, it seems there isn't a centos or Red Hat
>> slave, I'll file a request to INFRA for this then.
>
> You also have the option to run the build with docker on ubuntu using a
> centos docker image. I think it would be wise to evaluate that option before
> filing a request to INFRA. The great benefit is that you can build an rpm and
> test a built rpm on all the rhel flavored docker images that you would like
> to support without the requirement to add additional operating systems or
> hardware to the zoo of build slaves.
+1
Despite the issues[*], I’m looking forward to a day when INFRA brings
the hammer down and requires everyone to use Docker on the Linux machines.
I’ve spent the past week looking at why the Jenkins bits have become so
unstable on the ‘Hadoop’ nodes. One thing that is obvious is that the jobs
running in containers are way easier to manage from the outside. They don’t
leave processes hanging about and provides enough hooks to make sure jobs are
getting a ‘fair share’ of the node’s resources. Bad actor? Kill the entire
container. Bam, gone. That’s before even removing the need to ask for software
to be installed. [No need for 900 different versions of Java installed if
everyone manages their own…]
* - mainly, disk space management and docker-compose creating a complete mess
of things.