On Monday 26 April 2010 11:10:26 am Jesse Keating wrote: > On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 19:02 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: > > Ok, do you find the attached revised version clearer? > > Does /syslinux/enforce exist in cases where we're not either permissive > or enforcing? If it only exists in those cases, couldn't we just do a > "if os.path.exists()" call on it? > > If not, then what you have looks fine. [au...@x86-05 ~]$ ls /selinux/ [au...@x86-05 ~]$ /usr/sbin/getenforce Disabled
/selinux is empty when its disabled Dennis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- buildsys mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/buildsys
