On 12/5/13 9:36 AM, Bojtos Péter wrote:
The problem appeared today again, although I set up in kojira to keep repos for 
1 week. The root log's end is this:

DEBUG util.py:314:  Executing command: /usr/bin/repoquery -c 
/var/lib/mock/dist-slxrv3-build-7179-1529/root//etc/yum.conf -a --qf '%{nevra} 
%{buildtime} %{size} %{pkgid} %{repoid}' > 
/var/lib/mock/dist-slxrv3-build-7179-1529/result/available_pkgs with env {'LANG': 
'en_US.UTF-8', 'TERM': 'vt100', 'SHELL': '/bin/bash', 'HOSTNAME': 'mock', 'HOME': 
'/builddir', 'PATH': '/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin'}
DEBUG util.py:264:  Traceback (most recent call last):
DEBUG util.py:264:    File "/usr/bin/repoquery", line 1510, in <module>
DEBUG util.py:264:      main(sys.argv)
DEBUG util.py:264:    File "/usr/bin/repoquery", line 1504, in main
DEBUG util.py:264:      repoq.runQuery(regexs)
DEBUG util.py:264:    File "/usr/bin/repoquery", line 982, in runQuery
DEBUG util.py:264:      pkgs = self.matchPkgs(items, plain_pkgs=plain_pkgs)
DEBUG util.py:264:    File "/usr/bin/repoquery", line 903, in matchPkgs
DEBUG util.py:264:      pkgs = self.returnPkgList(patterns=items)
DEBUG util.py:264:    File "/usr/bin/repoquery", line 856, in returnPkgList
DEBUG util.py:264:      pkgs = self.pkgSack.returnNewestByNameArch(**kwargs)
DEBUG util.py:264:    File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/yum/__init__.py", line 
1013, in <lambda>
DEBUG util.py:264:      pkgSack = property(fget=lambda self: self._getSacks(),
DEBUG util.py:264:    File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/yum/__init__.py", 
line 779, in _getSacks
DEBUG util.py:264:      self.repos.populateSack(which=repos)
DEBUG util.py:264:    File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/yum/repos.py", 
line 309, in populateSack
DEBUG util.py:264:      self.doSetup()
DEBUG util.py:264:    File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/yum/repos.py", 
line 134, in doSetup
DEBUG util.py:264:      self.retrieveAllMD()
DEBUG util.py:264:    File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/yum/repos.py", 
line 92, in retrieveAllMD
DEBUG util.py:264:      downloading = repo._commonRetrieveDataMD_list(mdtypes)
DEBUG util.py:264:    File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/yum/yumRepo.py", 
line 1540, in _commonRetrieveDataMD_list
DEBUG util.py:264:      os.rename(local, local + '.old.tmp')
DEBUG util.py:264:  OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
DEBUG util.py:354:  Child return code was: 1
DEBUG util.py:314:  Executing command: ['/bin/umount', '-n', '-l', 
'/var/lib/mock/dist-slxrv3-build-7179-1529/root/dev/pts'] with env {'LANG': 
'en_US.UTF-8', 'TERM': 'vt100', 'SHELL': '/bin/bash', 'HOSTNAME': 'mock', 
'HOME': '/builddir', 'PATH': '/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin'}


The server is:
koji-hub-1.8.0-1.el6.noarch

The builder version is:
koji-builder-1.8.0-1.fc17.noarch

This looks like a problem with mock or repoquery. What version of those do you have installed on your builder?

Any suggestion, where to start to debug?

Thank you,
Peter


----- Eredeti üzenet -----
Feladó: "Didier Fabert" <[email protected]>
Címzett: "Discussion of Fedora build system" <[email protected]>
Elküldött üzenetek: Kedd, 2013. November 19. 10:28:19
Tárgy: Re: Koji regen-repo error

On Friday 15 November 2013 09:04:11 Mike Bonnet wrote:
On 11/15/13 5:48 AM, Didier Fabert wrote:
Hi all,

I have strange error since last week on my koji. All regen-repo tasks are
failed with error LockError: [Errno 37] No locks available

Koji works perfectly since January month. Directory /mnt/koji is a nfs
mount but i can touch a new file on it. Database is ok too.

I have two builders, and error appear on both.

Any idea ?


koji.LockError is only raised in two places, both around fnctl.lockf():

http://docs.python.org/release/2.6.8/library/fcntl.html#fcntl.lockf

The fcntl manpage says:

ENOLCK Too many segment locks open, lock table is full, or a remote
locking protocol failed (e.g., locking over NFS).

Are you mounting /mnt/koji over nfs?  Maybe the nfslock service died?
Is something else holding a lot of locks?

Yes, you're right, nfslock was dead on NFS server (el5)
After restarting nfslock service on my NFS server, all is OK.

Thanks a lot Mike to pointing me to the right direction.

--
Didier
--
buildsys mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/buildsys
--
buildsys mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/buildsys


--
buildsys mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/buildsys

Reply via email to