On 02/19/2015 04:38 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 8:44 PM, Mike McLean <mi...@redhat.com> wrote:
On 02/19/2015 03:35 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 8:33 PM, Mike McLean <mi...@redhat.com> wrote:
0001 - Added a bunch of predefined archivetypes. Most of these were added
in
our internal instance over time. Let me know if any of these look wrong.
0002 - just a nicer error message if a host authenticates as a non-host
user
Any chance you could use git send-email or send them inline, makes
them easier to read/review rather than having to load them into
external viewers?
Hmm. they appear fine in Thunderbird, but I guess probably not in others.
I'll look into it.
OTOH, it is much more reliable for me to consume patches that are attached.
I've encountered numerous cases of mangling with inline patches over the
years
"git am" tends to work quite well for that
Yes, git am is my friend (note that it also works on downloaded
attachments from git format-patch). However, if something in the mail
pipeline has mangled the inline patch, git am can fail. Maybe it was
someone misusing the tools, but I've had lots of pains with inline patches.
OTOH if other folks have no problems, maybe my experience is an
aberration. So, I've set up git send-email and I'll try that next time.
--
buildsys mailing list
buildsys@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/buildsys
