On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 5:59 AM Vít Ondruch <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Dne 02. 06. 20 v 23:02 Quentin Barnes napsal(a): > > I author a kmod rpm package that uses the %kernel_module_package > > macro. That macro used to be in the /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/macros > > file, but was moved in RHEL 8 and later versions of Fedora to > > the /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d/macros.kmp file which is owned by the > > "kernel-rpm-macros" package. > > > > If I attempt to build my packages on these later systems with mock, > > they break imediately even when just trying to create the srpm > > because the %kernel_module_package macro is undefined leading to > > a spec file parse error. > > > > What I need help with is understanding where the bug is and the best > > way to fix it. > > > > I would think that either: 1) my spec file needs to be updated in > > some way to mitigate this change > > > It could be as easy as replacing: > > ~~~ > > %kernel_module_package > > ~~~ > > > by > > > ~~~ > > %{?kernel_module_package} > > ~~~ > > > This should allow to build the SRPM and later when binary RPM is build, > there have to be `BR: kernel-rpm-macros`. >
Unfortunately, that's not good enough. The %kernel_module_package macro defines BRs and a subpackage. Without the macro working as designed (where the macros already exist in the buildroot), kernel modules cannot be successfully built. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ buildsys mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
