Dne 11. 08. 20 v 20:31 PGNet Dev napsal(a):
> On 8/11/20 11:08 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
>> Perhaps the %_forge_dist macro needs to be used with question mark as well?
>> Similarly to how the %dist macro is used?
>>
>> Release: 1%{?dist} => Release: 1%{?_forge_dist}
>>
>> But I don't know; I never used it.
> noted.
>
> I'm not sure why that should be expected to work. There's no fallback ...
> and, in this case, i expect/require that %{_forge_dist} is def'd. Exactly as
> it does in the local mock env.
>
> In any case, if I change in the spec
>
> - %global dist %{?_forge_dist}
This ^^might be undefined if `%{_forge_dist}` does not exists. You
should use some fallback, e.g.:
~~~
%global dist %{?_forge_dist}%{!?_forge_dist:fallback_dist}
~~~
Vít
> + %global dist %{?_forge_dist}
>
> Name: %{_redis_name}
> 36 Release: %{dist}
>
> The build fails again, but now at
>
> stderr: error: line 36: Empty tag: Release:
> can't parse specfile
>
> I'm stymied as to why COPR build -- which I understood to be a mock env? --
> behaves significantly differently than a local mock build.
> _______________________________________________
> buildsys mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
_______________________________________________
buildsys mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]