Thanks for response,
Why separate repository would be
needed? CentOS-8 as far as I can see contains 32-bit versions
of all packages that I need. I can
manually install them and compile the package, no problems.
But when I try to compile the package
using mock it tries also to pull in 32-bit binaries, when
target arch is specified as i386. And
when it is not specified, then naturally 64-bit is used
throughout.
On 19.12.2020 21:14, Stephen John
Smoogen wrote:
On Sat, 19 Dec 2020 at 03:59, Michael Ivanov <[email protected]> wrote:
Hallo,
I'm trying to build 32 bit rpm package for centos8 with mock. When I specify target arch as i386, then a lot of packages are reported as not found. When arch is omitted, then mock tries to build 64-bit package.
In mock config I have:
config_opts['target_arch'] = 'i386'
config_opts['legal_host_arches'] = ('x86_64')
This worked in older centos systems.
Any hints?
RHEL and CentOS-8 do not have 32 bit support in the default directories. If you need to build for 32 bit you will need to use the 'altarch' CentOS-8.
_______________________________________________Best regards,
-- \ / | | (OvO) | Михаил Иванов | (^^^) | | \^/ | E-mail: [email protected] | ^ ^ | |
buildsys mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
--
Stephen J Smoogen.
-- \ / | | (OvO) | Михаил Иванов | (^^^) | | \^/ | E-mail: [email protected] | ^ ^ | |
_______________________________________________ buildsys mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
