In a message dated 4/2/2005 4:48:46 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Have dull knives really cut more people than sharp knives? yrs. ffyrup It seems reasonable to assume that there are more dull knives than
properly sharpened ones, and given that dull knives are generally considered to
be more dangerous than sharp ones, it therefore seems reasonable to assume
that more people are cut by dull knives than by sharp ones.
I don't think this theory works for Captain Kangaroo Safety Scissors,
however. But they may pinch more fingers than sharp scissors cut.
Please and thank you for a Tootsie Roll.
Ralph
|
- [BP] edgy? Met History
- Re: [BP] edgy? RLWALTR
- Re: [BP] edgy? Bruce Marcham
- Re: [BP] edgy? RLWALTR
- Re: [BP] edgy? Met History
- Re: [BP] edgy? RLWALTR