On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Jim Connors <James.Connors at sun.com> wrote: > > Microprocessors/Controllers are no doubt important, but what's critical here > is understanding how this new distro will be: > > o refactored so that it will be considerably smaller than the current > "embedded" distros floating around > o configurable with regards to adding/removing functionality > o any other plans? (e.g. incorporating a version of BusyBox ...)
Opensolaris already has its own, much superior, version of busybox based on AT&T technology, including ksh93. In terms of "bang for buck" its faster, more flexible, has a CDDL and GPL compatible license, all built in commands conform to POSIX standards and its available TODAY in Solaris. Irek
