On Wednesday 02 May 2007 13:07, Miguel Angel Alvarez wrote: > Hi. > > We are substituting the use of busybox syslogd for our own log system > (not at all generalistic... that is why I won' t try to submit patches > for it). However we would like to maintain klogd as is. > > Why is the klogd configuration integrated into syslogd configuration? > The communication mechanism between could be used in other systems. > > Wouldn't it be useful to split them?
Absolutely. I applied your patch to svn. -- vda _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
