On Monday 27 August 2007, Johan Adolfsson wrote: > Wouldn't we get reduced wearing and possibly a general speed up as well, > if we made sure sed was buffering stuff more and avoiding small writes > to the filesystem? > Then there shouldn't be much difference in flash wearing compared to a > copy.
any decent flash filesystem will handle these details at the kernel level -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
