If this patch eliminates duplicates which directly follow upon each other in the history, I welcome it very much, because the usual behaviour is quite annoying. If it eliminates duplicates in the whole history (like the UNIX command 'uniq'), this might not be desired, but without having applied the patch I just assume you implemented variant #1 and say it is a great thing to have.
Regards -- Alexander Kriegisch > I wrote a patch to ignore duplicates if HISTCONTROL contains > "ignoredups". This is bash's behaviour I got used to. Haven't > implemented the other options HISTCONTROL offers, as they don't make > much sense to me. _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
