On Friday 10 July 2009 21:23, Maximilian Gass wrote: > On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 05:16:39AM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > > As far as I can tell, we're in compliance with SUSv4 and your sed command > > isn't. (Of course gnu has magic extensions out the wazoo and your program > > expects them. I guess what you're asking is "please implement this funky > > gnu > > extension that makes numeric addresses special, even when the ending case > > is a > > regex...) > > Please note this is not my program, but the (e)glibc.
and I still cant fix it because you did not send me the reproducer. -- vda _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
