On Sunday 14 March 2010 19:05:48 Denys Vlasenko wrote: > On Sunday 14 March 2010 19:22, Rob Landley wrote: > > So, following up on the resounding response to my previous post (from the > > crickets), > > My response would be "generally I like it, but am too lazy > to work on it at the moment"...
I was expecting to have to do the heavy lifting myself. :) > > I'd like to guage the interest in me trying to move busybox towards > > the toybox infrastructure. Obviously this would have to be broken up and > > done in stages, my question is "do you guys agree it's worth doing"? > > I am not sure I want the part which autoscans for *.c files > (I frequently have extra *.c files lying around). The scan looks for the specially formatted headers, and if it doesn't find them it ignores the file. Also, if you're working on a command that doesn't build at the moment, you can "mv thingy.c thingy.new" and then it'll be ignored until you put it back. Rob -- Latency is more important than throughput. It's that simple. - Linus Torvalds _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
