Hi all, We're using busybox for embedded linux routers firmware, and have attached patch for years. Microsoft was added 249 (0xF9) dhcp option in Windows XP/2003 clients when there was no rfc3442 accepted. So, supporting that option would be useful for soho networking scene.
Need to say, 121 option have priority over 3 (router) and 33 (classful static routes) and should be placed before them in request packet, according rfc. If client supports both 121 and 249 options, it should request them both, but the only difference between them is in the fact that 249 used as addition to 3/33 options. Best Regards, theMIROn ICQ: 303357 Skype: the.miron
300-udhcp-msroutes.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
