On Sunday 23 January 2011 20:44, Peter Korsgaard wrote: > >>>>> "Rich" == Rich Felker <dal...@aerifal.cx> writes: > > Hi, > > Rich> Is there a reason you're not considering the alarm approach? > Rich> alarm+drain will not hang at all if the buffer drains immediately. > Rich> sleep+flush or usleep+flush will *always* sleep at least some > Rich> interval, which is annoying to the user. > > Indeed. It seems vastly superior, and only slightly more complicated.
What happened to "we are busybox, we like simple solutions"? Rob periodically grills me that I am making it too complicated... -- vda _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
