>> Bashisms are arguably Linux-specific extensions to Single Unix, don't >> you think ? ;) > no, not even close. i dont know why people think "bash == Linux", but > it doesnt. it is actively used on many many more systems than just > Linux, and i guess i need to point out the fact that bash is far older > than Linux.
Okay, then replace "Linux-specific" with "GNU-specific"; as far as I know, GNU is still not Unix, *especially in embedded environments that BusyBox is targetting*, and bash is still not the reference sh implementation. But you have a point. -- Laurent _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
