Am 10.09.2011 04:31, schrieb Denys Vlasenko: > On Thursday 14 July 2011 11:57, Matthias Andree wrote: >> - Is there a particular reason the sed scripts use GNU extensions or >> syntax? What are the chances of these being replaced by POSIX default >> constructs (If none, add: possibly if I submit a patch)? > > Since I use GNU or busybox sed, I don't know where we use > extensions. Where exactly is the problem?
ISTR I replied to this message before, but I'll see what I can find out about awk. It's a minor issue at any rate. > We probably need to remove the #if around this decl in libbb.h: > > #if !defined __FreeBSD__ > char *dirname(char *path); > #endif > > Can you confirm that it helps? It's bogus because ours is const char *. #include <libgen.h> is the way. I think I've made that clear through various messages on the list (which you may be reading later according to the order in which you process your inbox). _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
