On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 10:44:59PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Monday 24 September 2012 15:13:49 Cathey, Jim wrote: > > This is a uLibc fault. A common idiom, > > from way back, is: > > > > close(creat(...)); > > > > Close is supposed to be able to survive being > > given a negative number. > > yes, if close(-1) is crashing, fix uClibc. bloating busybox to work around > buggy C lib like this is not good.
_How_ was this happening? I'd really be interested in knowing how you could mess up close() that bad... Rich _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
