On Thursday 20 June 2013 05:13:44 Laurent Bercot wrote: > > its existence does not guarantee it will be correctly populated. in his > > case, he's seeing DT_UNKNOWN in the field which means the lstat fallback > > is needed. > > Hence the need for a build-time test to *run* a program that creates a > few file types in a temp directory and then checks whether the > corresponding d_type matches. This the point I was making to Rick a few > days ago.
i was thinking more about blacklisting known bad C libraries/arch combos (or whitelisting known good versions). but that's not really scalable. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
