Hi, On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:47:55PM -0400, Patrick 'P. J.' McDermott wrote: > On 2013-09-17 18:56, Rich Felker wrote: > > - strcpy(uname_info.os, "GNU/Linux"); > > + strcpy(uname_info.os, > > +#ifdef __GLIBC__ > > + "GNU/" > > +#endif > > + "Linux"); > > I'd agree that most BusyBox-based systems can hardly be called > "GNU/Linux", even with glibc. It seems inappropriate to call a system > "GNU" if it has little or no GNU software.
Maybe in the case when GNU toolchain was not used to compile the system? > But I'd call such a system "BusyBox/Linux" instead, since BusyBox is the > userspace, regardless of the C library in my opinion. My systems have uname from busybox, but I also have ~80 other packages installed, so "BusyBox/Linux" would be also wrong. Maybe it should be configurable. A. _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
