09.12.2013 17:51, Michael Tokarev пишет: Forgot to comment on this:
> tar symlinks mode (both kfreebsd and hurd) > --- expected > +++ actual > @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ > input_dir/input_file > -input_dir/input_soft -> input_file > +input_dir/input_soft -> input_dir/input_file > input_file -> input_dir/input_file > -input_soft -> input_dir/input_soft > +input_soft -> input_file > Ok: 0 > -rwxr----x input_dir/input_file > -lrwxrwxrwx input_file > +-rwxr----x input_dir/input_soft > -rwxr----x input_file > -lrwxrwxrwx input_file > +lrwxr-xr-x input_file On both kfreebsd and hurd, ln <symlink> directory/ performs the linking of the _target_ of the symlink, not the symlink itself. So while in this test, we expect input_dir/input_soft to be a symlink (hardlinked with input_soft), it actually is a hardlink with input_file. Thanks, /mjt _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
