On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 07:14:05PM +0200, Harald Becker wrote: > Hi Tito ! > > >I've tried to find out if memset is really optimized away in > >this case with some test code that I've compiled with : > > What is wrong with optimization of code, e.g. replacing call to > memset by a quick loop which does same thing even faster than a > function call? ... beside that such optimization needs normally a > bit more of space it is faster and does same thing as original > function call. Try using size optimization (-Os) to avoid > replacing function calls by inline replacements.
The quick loop will equally be optimized away, as neither it nor the memset have any observable effect. Rich _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
