2014-07-28 18:48 GMT+02:00 Timo Teras <timo.te...@iki.fi>: > > I was taking sizeof of individual element: meminfo[0]. Alternative > would be sizeof *meminfo. I prefer not to expand to the actual type. > It's easier to change if needed, and the correctness more obvious as > you don't need to look what was type of meminfo - looking at the > memset line alone is sufficient. >
You're right, my bad. I misread it as meminfo[]. Best regards, Bartosz Gołaszewski _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
