On Sat, Dec 6, 2014, at 18:11, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> Please see attached patch (only compile-tested so far).
> It builds on your work, implementing in-memory compression
> for all unpackers we have.

It misses the "plus one zero byte" behavior of the non-compressed path
(xmalloc_read). I bet some callers depend on it, using str* functions on
the returned buffer.

- Lauri

-- 
http://www.fastmail.com - Same, same, but different...

_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
busybox@busybox.net
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox

Reply via email to