On Sat, Dec 6, 2014, at 18:11, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > Please see attached patch (only compile-tested so far). > It builds on your work, implementing in-memory compression > for all unpackers we have.
It misses the "plus one zero byte" behavior of the non-compressed path (xmalloc_read). I bet some callers depend on it, using str* functions on the returned buffer. - Lauri -- http://www.fastmail.com - Same, same, but different... _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox