Frankly, I find it rather ugly to have to write a shell script, or a C program and to alter the environment or write files just to circumvent a dubious and historic "aesthetic" design choice.
Please understand me well, I have a functional (but ugly) solution implemented for now which could satisfy me. I'm just trying to do my best to propose a sensible, even if minor enhancement to busybox. I'm sending my patch in it's current form in another thread. Thank you all for all your interesting comments. 2016-02-01 15:44 GMT+01:00 Jody Bruchon <j...@jodybruchon.com>: > On February 1, 2016 9:28:58 AM EST, Sean Mathews <mathe...@nutech.com> > wrote: > >Maybe write a simple C init wrapper and have it call the real init > >process. > > Write a shell script that stores its arguments in a particular text file > i.e. 'echo "$@" > /var/log/init_cmdline'. Have that shell script 'exec > /sbin/init $@' at the end. > > That would preserve the argument list somewhere with no modifications to > BusyBox and remain otherwise functionally identical. It should also work > with any init binary you choose. > _______________________________________________ > busybox mailing list > busybox@busybox.net > http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox >
_______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
