On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Mark O'Donovan <shif...@eircom.net> wrote:
> Command otherwise may hang indefinately if unable to resolve peers.
> ---
> networking/ntpd.c | 9 +++++----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/networking/ntpd.c b/networking/ntpd.c
> index 3273cdd..25e19f8 100644
> --- a/networking/ntpd.c
> +++ b/networking/ntpd.c
> @@ -2152,6 +2152,11 @@ static NOINLINE void ntp_init(char **argv)
> #endif
> &G.verbose);
>
> + if (!(opts & OPT_n)) {
> + bb_daemonize_or_rexec(DAEMON_DEVNULL_STDIO, argv);
> + logmode = LOGMODE_NONE;
> + }
> +
> // if (opts & OPT_x) /* disable stepping, only slew is allowed */
> // G.time_was_stepped = 1;
> if (peers) {
> @@ -2194,10 +2199,6 @@ static NOINLINE void ntp_init(char **argv)
> setsockopt_int(G_listen_fd, IPPROTO_IP, IP_TOS,
> IPTOS_LOWDELAY);
> }
> #endif
> - if (!(opts & OPT_n)) {
> - bb_daemonize_or_rexec(DAEMON_DEVNULL_STDIO, argv);
> - logmode = LOGMODE_NONE;
> - }
> /* I hesitate to set -20 prio. -15 should be high enough for
> timekeeping */
> if (opts & OPT_N)
> setpriority(PRIO_PROCESS, 0, -15);
> --
> 1.9.1
>
Any thoughts on these changes?
Thanks,
Mark
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
busybox@busybox.net
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
