On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Kang-Che Sung <explore...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 7:40 PM, Xabier Oneca -- xOneca > <xon...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hello Kang-Che, >> >>> diff --git a/procps/kill.c b/procps/kill.c >>> index 57a33bcaa..198c78de0 100644 >>> --- a/procps/kill.c >>> +++ b/procps/kill.c >>> @@ -285,10 +285,10 @@ int kill_main(int argc UNUSED_PARAM, char **argv) >>> >>> /* Looks like they want to do a kill. Do that */ >>> while (arg) { >>> -#if ENABLE_ASH || ENABLE_HUSH >>> +#if ENABLE_ASH || ENABLE_SH_IS_ASH || ENABLE_BASH_IS_ASH >> >> You dropped ENABLE_HUSH here. Is it intentional? >> > hush doesn't have a built-in kill command. Yes, it's intentional.
Correction. Well, hush _used to_ not have a built-in kill command, but it seems that Denys Vlasenko tried to implement it recently: https://git.busybox.net/busybox/commit/?id=1125d7d6801940a5218b74c8fd46f1eaa2e4de39 And so my patch got modified by him before getting merged. _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox