On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 10:52 PM, Deb McLemore <de...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > Any logic attempting to guess at the state of startup will give false > confidence that the signaling setup is completed.
The case of init not being ready to handle its duties for an extremely early process is in itself a rather corner case. I would imagine some people seeing as a bug, and maybe even having kernel fixed to avoid it. I can just disagree to cater for this case and propose people affected by it to have a special /sbin/poweroff script with whatever magic they want. E.g.: #!/bin/sh while true; do /bin/busybox poweroff "$@" /bin/sleep 1 done So far I'm open to adding a workaround in poweroff code, if it's not adding stuff to the init per se - why add bloat to the process which is always there? _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox