Since we are introducing the feature of embedding scripts into BusyBox, and user may now include and build their custom scripts into the BusyBox binary, I think there's one thing we forgot to address when this binary would be distributed. That is: the license problem.
Specifically, I think the current state of config ASH_EMBEDDED_SCRIPTS help text did not yet warn builders that the binary may be distributed **only when the embedding scripts are GPLv2-compatible**. Builder and distributors may accidentally violate copyright if they didn't get careful at reading the BusyBox licenses. I think something should be done to make the warning more explicit. I'm not sure if additional measures needs to be done to check the script's license (is it good to require every script in the embed directory to carry a licence tag, or is that overkill?) _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox