I think a possible alternative would be: + if (prev == BC_INST_BOOL_NOT || nexprs != 1) return s;
+ for (i = 0; i < next.len && t != next.tokens[i]; ++i) continue; + if (i == next.len) return BC_STATUS_PARSE_BAD_EXP; Is that what you would like? Gavin Howard On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 1:33 PM Denys Vlasenko <vda.li...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 6:17 PM Gavin Howard <gavin.d.how...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > After making changes to the bc for Denys' requests, I have a better > > version of the bc. > > > > This version, pasted at https://pastebin.com/0M9sMhtM and raw at > > https://pastebin.com/raw/0M9sMhtM, has fulfilled every one of Denys' > > requests except for a few. > > > + s = BC_STATUS_PARSE_BAD_EXP; > + if (prev == BC_INST_BOOL_NOT || nexprs != 1) return s; > + > + for (i = 0; s && i < next.len; ++i) s *= t != next.tokens[i]; > + if (s) return s; > > This is not readable _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
