Greetings, is there a way to workaround it somehow?
> Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2020 at 7:11 PM > From: "Markus Gothe" <nietzs...@lysator.liu.se> > To: "daggs" <da...@gmx.com>, busybox@busybox.net > Subject: Re: bb's bash errors in a script that works in normal bash > > Correct, it is not part of the Almquist shell. So it not supported yet AFAIK, > however in busybox there are some bash-compatiblity hacks so it might be > implemented one day. > > //Markus > > Sent from my BlackBerry - the most secure mobile device > > > Original Message > > > From: da...@gmx.com > Sent: August 25, 2020 14:39 > To: busybox@busybox.net > Subject: bb's bash errors in a script that works in normal bash > > > Greetings, > > I have the following script: > $ cat test1.sh > #!/bin/bash -x > > do_trace() { > local depth=0 > > [ -z "${CT_XLDD_VERBOSE}" ] && return 0 > > for((depth=0; "${#FUNCNAME[$((depth+1))]}" != 0; depth++)); do :; done > printf "%*s" $((4*(depth-1))) "" >&2 > printf -- "$@" >&2 > } > > do_trace > > when I run it with normal bash it works, with bb's bash it doesn't, see: > > $ /tmp/busybox-1.32.0/busybox bash ./test1.sh > bash: syntax error: unterminated ${name} > BusyBox v1.32.0 (2020-08-25 15:22:10 IDT) multi-call binary. > > Usage: bash [-enxl] [-c 'SCRIPT' [ARG0 [ARGS]] / FILE [ARGS] / -s [ARGS]] > > Unix shell interpreter > $ ./test1.sh > + do_trace > + local depth=0 > + '[' -z '' ']' > + return 0 > > as I understand it, FUNCNAME is not implemented in bb, am I correct? > > Thanks, > > Dagg. > _______________________________________________ > busybox mailing list > busybox@busybox.net > http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox > _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox