On Thu Apr 8, 2021 at 9:24 AM BST, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > Why not go all the way and start using utimensat() and do nanoseconds? > That's the resolution presented in struct stat, and what most file > systems store - without that, it's not possible to accurately replicate > one file's timestamps on another. Also, POSIX nowadays specifies touch > in terms of utimensat() > <https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/touch.html>. > > Rasmus Actually, it seems utimensat() is a function specified in SUSV4 that would make FEATURE_TOUCH_SUS3 somewhat misleading Perhaps it should be renamed to FEATURE_TOUCH_SUSV4 if that is going to be the approach taken
That would also make the code further down more messy, as you'd need more #if to cover a version using utimes(), and a version using utimenstat() What do you think? _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
