Roberto wrote: > IMHO this line > >> + if (iflag || job_warning) >> goto out; > > should be modified in this way > >> + if (!iflag || job_warning) >> goto out; > > Non-interactive shells should not care about stopped jobs but >interactive shells do as you said. > > Is that right?
It is. My bad. Actually, things are a bit more complicated. I had a patch queued for submission which has an impact on this. I foresee a series of patches. Give me a moment... Ron _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
