On 2/16/22 19:32, Kang-Che Sung wrote:
Now, for an example where it makes a difference. Consider a Bash script
like this:
# enable automatic error handling
set -eo pipefail
# check for string "issues" in a logfile
cat logfile | grep issue | sort --unique
If there are no issues in the logs, grep return exit code 1 and the
shell interprets this as an error and exits itself.
Why do we need to implement a workaround in grep while you can
do this in shell to ignore the exit code of grep?
{ grep issue <logfile || :; } | sort --unique
In order to implement his suggestion, you need to only ignore exit code
1, while still allowing other exit codes to abort the script. (like a
system error while reading the file)
But also, I've never seen ":" used as a command... where is that
documented? Is it equivalent to 'true'?
-Mike C
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
busybox@busybox.net
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox