From: John Lemonovich > Sent: 13 December 2022 15:59 > > Thanks for the replies. Yes David, it's also my understanding per the spec, > that the client's link- > local address must be included for the solicit message. The reply from the > server is unicast. What > do you mean by the proper IPv6 version of the script...to which script are > you referring to? Can you > possibly show an example?
The one that probably ends up in /usr/share/udhcpc/default.script and is passed to udhcpc6 with the -s option. Not the least of the problems is that you need to explicitly delete the old IPv6 address (in deconfig). I think the script I started from deleted the IPv4 address! There is also the issue that you need to do a 'mark and scan' pass over the routes (even in IPv4) to ensure the system isn't left with an invalid routing table during renew processing. > Just out of curiosity, has it ever been tested or known to work with a DHCPv6 > server then? Works for us (in testing anyway). There has also been a bug to do with release renewal. Might have been fixed. If any of our customers decide to use IPv6 I'll need to check - they clearly haven't on the previous product! (The lack of bugs is a pretty good hint.) I presume you are running a reasonably recent kernel. Anything really archaic might be buggy - but you should have a few years. Are you actually running Linux on a nios2? I can't actually imagine that being fast enough for anything useful. (Or does the arria10 contain an arm core?) We do use nios cpu - but only running a few kb of code. David - Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK Registration No: 1397386 (Wales) _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox