On 4 May 2023 13:59:41 CEST, Primoz Fiser <primoz.fi...@norik.com> wrote:
>2) If we invest time implementing hwlock set/get RTC params, would you >be willing to accept it? We would like to avoid developing a solution >that won't be accepted into busybox upstream. I think it makes sense, yes. > >3) At this stage, looking at [2], do you see any potential issues when >trying to support hwclock set/get RTC params on Busybox? I would not put too much effort into supporting older kernels for this, just a simple version check, if you agree. thanks, _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
