On Fri, 21 Jul 2023 21:39:57 +0200 "Roberto A. Foglietta" <roberto.foglie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> To the maintainers and everyone else whom can be interested, > > today I developed for a mobile device running a Linux kernel and > related GNU system (almost) a quite promising version of 'strings' > faster than the original and giving out the same output with the same > syntax. Good for me! > > I hope it will be good enough for you also. However, before starting > the integration with busybox I wish to know if this applet and/or its > implementation or an improved one, would have a good chance and > appreciation to enter in the busybox development stream. > > Here in the attachment I put the .c file in GPLv2, like busybox. In > its header just a raw estimation of its performance that can vary from > system to system and among different platforms but at least comparable > with the original from binutils. > > Best regards, R- Hi, seems to me that the current strings busybox implementation is faster. tito@devuan:~/Desktop$ time ./strings vmlinux.o > out.txt real 0m0.369s user 0m0.365s sys 0m0.004s tito@devuan:~/Desktop$ time ./busybox strings vmlinux.o > out1.txt real 0m0.289s user 0m0.277s sys 0m0.012s tito@devuan:~/Desktop$ rm out*.txt tito@devuan:~/Desktop$ time ./strings vmlinux.o > out.txt real 0m0.355s user 0m0.347s sys 0m0.008s tito@devuan:~/Desktop$ time ./busybox strings vmlinux.o > out1.txt real 0m0.291s user 0m0.286s sys 0m0.004s tito@devuan:~/Desktop$ rm out*.txt tito@devuan:~/Desktop$ time ./strings vmlinux.o > out.txt real 0m0.356s user 0m0.335s sys 0m0.020s tito@devuan:~/Desktop$ time ./busybox strings vmlinux.o > out1.txt real 0m0.291s user 0m0.274s sys 0m0.016s Ciao, Tito _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
