Hi Rudi, > fixes non i386 and x86 builds > > libbb/hash_md5_sha.c: In function 'sha1_end': > libbb/hash_md5_sha.c:1316:35: error: 'sha1_process_block64_shaNI' > undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean > 'sha1_process_block64'? > 1316 | || ctx->process_block == sha1_process_block64_shaNI > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > | sha1_process_block64 > > Signed-off-by: Rudi Heitbaum <[email protected]> > --- > libbb/hash_md5_sha.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/libbb/hash_md5_sha.c b/libbb/hash_md5_sha.c > index 57a801459..75a61c32c 100644 > --- a/libbb/hash_md5_sha.c > +++ b/libbb/hash_md5_sha.c > @@ -1313,7 +1313,9 @@ unsigned FAST_FUNC sha1_end(sha1_ctx_t *ctx, void > *resbuf) > hash_size = 8; > if (ctx->process_block == sha1_process_block64 > #if ENABLE_SHA1_HWACCEL > +# if defined(__GNUC__) && (defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__)) > || ctx->process_block == sha1_process_block64_shaNI > +# endif > #endif > ) { > hash_size = 5; > -- > 2.43.0
This patch was already proposed earlier this month by Andre: http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/2024-September/090899.html Cheers, Xabier Oneca_,,_ _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
