From: Clayton Craft
> Sent: 23 October 2024 19:04
>
> On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 15:11:20 +0200 Natanael Copa <ncopa at alpinelinux.org>
> wrote:
> > I git bisected the bug to:
> > commit e2287f99fe6f21fd6435ad04340170ad4ba5f6b3
>
> I found that if this one byte is reverted from the patch you blamed, then
> your test passes:
>
> diff --git a/libbb/dump.c b/libbb/dump.c
> index b406a2428..92b0d762c 100644
> --- a/libbb/dump.c
> +++ b/libbb/dump.c
> @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ static NOINLINE void rewrite(priv_dumper_t *dumper, FS
> *fs)
> pr->flags = F_INT;
> if (e > int_convs + 1) /* not d or i? */
> pr->flags = F_UINT;
> - byte_count_str = "\010\004\002\001";
> + byte_count_str = "\004\002\001";
Without actually checking is that a fubar to do with 32bit v 64bit systems?
David
> goto DO_BYTE_COUNT;
> } else
> if (strchr(int_convs, *p1)) { /* %d etc */
>
>
> -Clayton
> _______________________________________________
> busybox mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
>
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT,
UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
