From: Sergey Gubarev <[email protected]>
Good day, dear maintainer.
There may be a memory leak in BusyBox 1.36.0 due to an explicitly unclosed
proc_ps descriptor. I propose a possible solution to the issue.
---
busybox/init/bootchartd.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/busybox/init/bootchartd.c b/busybox/init/bootchartd.c
index ae1ee9d..eb1b62b 100644
--- a/busybox/init/bootchartd.c
+++ b/busybox/init/bootchartd.c
@@ -260,6 +260,7 @@ static void do_logging(unsigned sample_period_us, int
process_accounting)
wait_more:
usleep(sample_period_us);
}
+ fclose(proc_ps);
}
static void finalize(char *tempdir, const char *prog, int
process_accounting)
--
2.30.2
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
