Hi,
On 2025. 03. 05. 17:38, Jeremy Drake wrote:
On Wed, 5 Mar 2025, Csókás Bence wrote:
I would much rather have a separate `static const char []` for this instead.
At that point, both would only be used once. In that case, would just
putting the string inline be better, or is the `static const char []`
still preferred?
It might be used more in the future. But yes, the optimal solution would
be one that requires only one string constant. I don't currently have
the brain capacity to figure that one out though.
Plus, it provides type safety, the ability to specify attributes,
linking directives in a linker script etc. So for me, I'd prefer the
static const variable.
Bence
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
